News and Society

Army officials said that four Army officers and two enlisted soldiers received letters of reprimand for sending boxes of Korans from a prison library to a burn pit at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Although an Army investigation that was made public on Monday found that the soldiers did not act out of “malicious intent” to disrespect the Koran or defame Islam, investigators concluded that they did not follow proper procedures, were ignorant of the importance of the Koran to Afghans and got no clear guidance from their leaders in a chain of mistakes.

The Marine Corps said three non-commissioned officers involved in a video that shows four Marines urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter received “nonjudicial punishments,” which could include letters of reprimand, a reduction in rank, forfeit of some pay, physical restriction to a military base, extra duties or some combination of those measures.

The Marine Corps did not release the results of its investigation into the episode because, officials said, there were continuing inquiries about higher-ranking officers in the unit involved, which was part of the Third Battalion, Second Marine Regiment, based in Camp Lejeune, N.C.

Military officials said the punishments were not as light as they might seem to the public — letters of reprimand effectively end most military careers — but it was unclear how they would be viewed in Afghanistan, where the Koran burning touched off days of riots across the country and compelled Mr. Karzai to call for a public trial.

American military officials said they were hopeful that Afghans would take the news calmly. “We have conveyed our condolences to the government and the Afghan people,” said Col. Thomas W. Collins, a spokesman for the international military coalition in Afghanistan. “These were both terrible mistakes.”

Neither the Army nor the Marine Corps released the names or specific ranks of the service members involved in the two episodes, which seriously worsened relations between the United States and Afghanistan, although the Koran burning engendered far more outrage than the Marine video did.

The Koran episode occurred in February at the library of the Parwan detention center on the edge of Bagram Air Base, where thousands of Afghans captured by American and international forces are held. Officers there worried that some detainees were communicating through notes written in library books, potentially to plan an attack. As a precaution, the officers assigned two Afghan-American interpreters to sort through the library’s books and identify those that might contain messages that could pose a security risk.

By the time the interpreters were finished, nearly 2,000 volumes, including copies of the Koran and other religious texts, had been set aside for removal. According to the investigation, one interpreter reported that up to 75 percent of the books in the library contained extremist content. But high-ranking Afghan religious officials who conducted their own inquiry said at the time that they doubted the writing in the books was anything other than personal notations, and that some of it was simply notes of detainees’ imprisonment, their names, their fathers’ names and the locations and times of their arrest.

Still, the books were deemed “sensitive material” by American military officials, who said they decided to burn them because there was no place to store them all. Although an Afghan National Army officer and a linguist expressed concern when they saw the books loaded onto a truck, they were still taken to the Bagram base’s incinerator. As workers began heaving them into the flames, an Afghan laborer offered to help — and then started screaming when he realized what they were. The Americans immediately stopped, but by then at least four Korans had been badly burned.

The officer who led the investigation, Brig. Gen. Bryan G. Watson, said in his report that the fact “that U.S. service members did not heed the warnings of their A.N.A. partners is, perhaps, my biggest concern.”

The Marine video became public in January, when it was posted on video-sharing Web sites including LiveLeak and YouTube. Military officials said at the time that they did not know who had made the video, but confirmed that it was authentic. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and other top officials swiftly expressed outrage and offered apologies to the Afghan government.

The video showed four Marines urinating over what appeared to be the corpses of three Taliban fighters. One of the Marines was heard saying, “Have a great day, buddy.”

Marine officials said on Monday that the action in the video took place during a counterinsurgency operation on or around July 27, 2011, in the Musa Qala district in Helmand Province, a Taliban stronghold and a center of opium poppy production that was the scene of tough fighting at the time. Of the roughly 1,000 Marines in the battalion, seven were killed during the unit’s seven-month deployment in the area.

The Marine Corps said in a statement that one of the three disciplined Marines pleaded guilty to urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter; another pleaded guilty to recording the video; and the third pleaded guilty to making a false statement to an investigator about his knowledge of the matter.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: August 28, 2012

An earlier version of this story omitted a distinction in rank of the service members involved in a a video that shows four Marines urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter. Three of the Marines are non-commissioned officers.

View the original article here

Army officials said that four Army officers and two enlisted soldiers received letters of reprimand for sending boxes of Korans from a prison library to a burn pit at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Although an Army investigation that was made public on Monday found that the soldiers did not act out of “malicious intent” to disrespect the Koran or defame Islam, investigators concluded that they did not follow proper procedures, were ignorant of the importance of the Koran to Afghans and got no clear guidance from their leaders in a chain of mistakes.

The Marine Corps said three non-commissioned officers involved in a video that shows four Marines urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter received “nonjudicial punishments,” which could include letters of reprimand, a reduction in rank, forfeit of some pay, physical restriction to a military base, extra duties or some combination of those measures.

The Marine Corps did not release the results of its investigation into the episode because, officials said, there were continuing inquiries about higher-ranking officers in the unit involved, which was part of the Third Battalion, Second Marine Regiment, based in Camp Lejeune, N.C.

Military officials said the punishments were not as light as they might seem to the public — letters of reprimand effectively end most military careers — but it was unclear how they would be viewed in Afghanistan, where the Koran burning touched off days of riots across the country and compelled Mr. Karzai to call for a public trial.

American military officials said they were hopeful that Afghans would take the news calmly. “We have conveyed our condolences to the government and the Afghan people,” said Col. Thomas W. Collins, a spokesman for the international military coalition in Afghanistan. “These were both terrible mistakes.”

Neither the Army nor the Marine Corps released the names or specific ranks of the service members involved in the two episodes, which seriously worsened relations between the United States and Afghanistan, although the Koran burning engendered far more outrage than the Marine video did.

The Koran episode occurred in February at the library of the Parwan detention center on the edge of Bagram Air Base, where thousands of Afghans captured by American and international forces are held. Officers there worried that some detainees were communicating through notes written in library books, potentially to plan an attack. As a precaution, the officers assigned two Afghan-American interpreters to sort through the library’s books and identify those that might contain messages that could pose a security risk.

By the time the interpreters were finished, nearly 2,000 volumes, including copies of the Koran and other religious texts, had been set aside for removal. According to the investigation, one interpreter reported that up to 75 percent of the books in the library contained extremist content. But high-ranking Afghan religious officials who conducted their own inquiry said at the time that they doubted the writing in the books was anything other than personal notations, and that some of it was simply notes of detainees’ imprisonment, their names, their fathers’ names and the locations and times of their arrest.

Still, the books were deemed “sensitive material” by American military officials, who said they decided to burn them because there was no place to store them all. Although an Afghan National Army officer and a linguist expressed concern when they saw the books loaded onto a truck, they were still taken to the Bagram base’s incinerator. As workers began heaving them into the flames, an Afghan laborer offered to help — and then started screaming when he realized what they were. The Americans immediately stopped, but by then at least four Korans had been badly burned.

The officer who led the investigation, Brig. Gen. Bryan G. Watson, said in his report that the fact “that U.S. service members did not heed the warnings of their A.N.A. partners is, perhaps, my biggest concern.”

The Marine video became public in January, when it was posted on video-sharing Web sites including LiveLeak and YouTube. Military officials said at the time that they did not know who had made the video, but confirmed that it was authentic. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and other top officials swiftly expressed outrage and offered apologies to the Afghan government.

The video showed four Marines urinating over what appeared to be the corpses of three Taliban fighters. One of the Marines was heard saying, “Have a great day, buddy.”

Marine officials said on Monday that the action in the video took place during a counterinsurgency operation on or around July 27, 2011, in the Musa Qala district in Helmand Province, a Taliban stronghold and a center of opium poppy production that was the scene of tough fighting at the time. Of the roughly 1,000 Marines in the battalion, seven were killed during the unit’s seven-month deployment in the area.

The Marine Corps said in a statement that one of the three disciplined Marines pleaded guilty to urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter; another pleaded guilty to recording the video; and the third pleaded guilty to making a false statement to an investigator about his knowledge of the matter.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: August 28, 2012

An earlier version of this story omitted a distinction in rank of the service members involved in a a video that shows four Marines urinating on the body of a dead Taliban fighter. Three of the Marines are non-commissioned officers.

View the original article here

Lawyer Tahir Naveed Chaudhry says there is no solid evidence against his client. Photograph: Anjum Naveed/AP

An official medical review of a Pakistani Christian girl accused of desecrating the Qur'an has determined that she is a minor, the girl's lawyer said on Tuesday.

The finding, which means she will be tried in the juvenile court system, could possibly defuse what has been a highly contentious case in Pakistan, where blasphemy can be punished with life in prison or even death.

The accusations against the girl have inflamed religious tensions in Pakistan and sparked a mass exodus of Christians from the girl's neighbourhood amid fear of retribution from Muslim neighbours.

Lawyer Tahir Naveed Chaudhry said a report by a medical board investigating the girl's age and mental state determined she was 14 years old.

He also said the board found her mental capacity did not correspond to her age. It was not clear exactly what that meant. Some Pakistani media reports have said the girl has Down's syndrome.

Chaudhry said a bail hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday and that he would move to dismiss the case afterwards, saying there was "no solid evidence" against his client.

He said he saw his client on Saturday in the Rawalpindi prison where she's being held and that she was "weeping and crying".

The girl was accused by a neighbour of burning pages of the Qur'an, Islam's holy book. But many aspects of the case have been in dispute since the incident surfaced a little under two weeks ago, including her age, her mental capabilities and what exactly she was burning.

The lawyer said a birth certificate provided by the church put her age at 11 years old, but the medical board later determined she was 14. Generally, birth certificates must be issued by the Pakistani government to be considered a legal document.

The case has once again put the spotlight on Pakistan's blasphemy laws, which critics say can be used to settle vendettas or seek retribution. Many of Pakistan's minorities, including Christians, live in fear of being accused of blasphemy.

Once someone is labelled a blasphemer, even if they are never convicted, they can face vigilante justice. In July, thousands of people dragged a Pakistani man accused of desecrating the Qur'an from a police station, beating him to death and setting his body alight.

The potential public backlash also means few people have spoken out to change or repeal the law. Last year two prominent politicians who criticised the blasphemy law were murdered, one by his own bodyguard, who then attracted adoring mobs.

View the original article here