News and Society

Former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown has urged ministers to support Nick Clegg after Lord Oakeshott criticised the deputy PM. Photograph: Murdo Macleod

Paddy Ashdown, the former Liberal Democrat leader, has made an impassioned plea for party members to avoid "short-term personal manoeuvring" and to stand by Nick Clegg after the first open revolt against his leadership.

As a senior party figure claimed that at least two Lib Dem cabinet ministers are "on manoeuvres", Ashdown called on the party to concentrate on making the coalition work under Clegg's leadership. His appeal, in a Guardian article, came after the Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott called on the party to consider deposing the deputy prime minister.

Oakeshott, a close ally of Vince Cable, the business secretary, told the Radio 4 Today programme that the Lib Dems need to take a careful look at their "strategy and management" because the party had seen its support halve since the election. Clegg hit back at Oakeshott, telling ITV News: "In politics you always have backseat drivers who sit there making endless comments about people who have to lead."

The moves by Clegg and Ashdown, who anointed the deputy prime minister as his eventual successor more than a decade ago, highlight nerves at the highest levels of the party about the rumbling debate over his leadership.

Oakeshott, a persistent critic of Clegg, advises Cable on an informal but regular basis but his comments prompted warnings by senior Lib Dems that the business secretary is one of two cabinet ministers making plans to succeed Clegg. Ed Davey, the energy and climate secretary, is also said to be "on manoeuvres", according to one well-placed source. Davey dismissed the claim about him as "utter rubbish".

Friends of Cable, who is on holiday and who knew nothing of Oakeshott's interview, denied that he was on manoeuvres. But Cable is aware that the peer has been agitating for some time against Clegg. Cable indicated in an FT interview earlier in the summer that he would be available if there were a vacancy.

Oakeshott decided to speak out after Clegg's interview with the Guardian this week in which the Lib Dem leader called for a wealth tax. The peer welcomed that but was disturbed when Clegg said he would make no attempt to woo back voters on the left who are "lost" to the party.

Cable and Davey will not make direct moves against the deputy prime minister, who told the Guardian that he would lead the party "through the next general election and beyond".

But it is expected they would stand if a vacancy arose in the same way that John Major stood for the Tory leadership in 1990 after Michael Heseltine brought down Margaret Thatcher.

Senior figures are saying that it would take a decisive intervention by a former leader – Sir Menzies Campbell, Charles Kennedy, Lord Steel – or a grandee, such as Lady Williams, for Clegg's position to be undermined. Amid these fears Clegg's original patron has decided to pre-empt any moves against his protege.

In a direct jibe at Oakeshott, Ashdown writes in the Guardian: "Every party dissident, minor or not, suddenly finds themselves welcome on every front page and in every news studio."

The former leader, who was initially wary of Clegg's decision to enter into a coalition with the Tories in 2010, praises Clegg for challenging the party to abandon its "comfort zone" and make the change from being a party of "perpetual opposition" to one of government.

"It is the job of our leader to take us into government," he writes. "I failed; Nick Clegg has succeeded. In my view he has led our party in government, not flawlessly of course, but with a skill no one else in British politics could have matched and a grace under fire which should make us proud. If you want to see how successful he has been, just listen to the complaints from the Tory right."

Ashdown adds that the Lib Dems in government have "mighty things" to achieve over the next year as Britain faces an "existential choice" in confronting the severest economic crisis in half a century. He cites a series of areas, such as "limiting the powers of the state to snoop into our lives" and "protecting our fundamental rights from attack in the name of security" where he says the Lib Dems will make a difference in government. The former party leader writes: "None of this will be achieved by being distracted by midterm summer polls, passing newspaper comments, or short-term personal manoeuvring. The right thing for Liberal Democrats to do now is to continue to do what we have done so well so far. Concentrate on the job we set our hands to under Nick's leadership. Nothing else."

Oakeshott became the first Lib Dem parliamentarian to call publicly for the party to consider a change of leadership, saying: "We have lost over half our market share – if you like to put it that way, if we had been Sainsbury's – since the election. Any business that had done that would be looking very hard now at both its strategy and its management to see how we get some of that back because otherwise we are going to lose a large number of seats at the next election." He made his intervention as part of a discussion on the Today programme with Peter Kellner, of YouGov, which recently found three times more respect for Cable than for Clegg among Lib Dem voters.

Ashdown writes: "Liberal Democrats have long ago learned to ignore the polls and get on with the job in hand. I should know. I am the only political leader in modern British history who has presided over an opinion poll rating represented by an asterisk – denoting that no detectable support could be found for us anywhere in the land!

"We will be judged at the next election by one fact and one fact only. Whether we have had the mettle to stay the course in delivering effective government for our country at a time of crisis. That is the only thing that matters. All the rest is the froth."

View the original article here

Not long ago, I met with a radio and TV veteran of the industry. He'd been reporting on the news, been a station manager in several major US cities. Today he runs his own radio show, and is enjoying himself and retirement, although I guess we could call it semi-retirement in that case. Anyway, he has the most excellent stories about his interviews with big-name politicians. He'd gotten up and asked some pretty tough questions of some pretty high ranking politicians running for many of the highest offices in the country.

Without naming names, he told me one story that went something like this; he had to cover for one of his reporters that was doing another news story in another part of the country, a presidential candidate had come to town, and since he had clearance from the Secret Service he was able to sit in the front row with reporters to ask questions. When the individual was done with their speech, and began taking questions he asked some really hard-core questions.

The candidate had dodged those questions, and as he began to ask more, he was being nudged towards the aisle, and duly escorted out of the facility. Other reporters saw what was going on, and they didn't like it, and because everyone knows everyone else in the media industry, they asked follow-up questions along the same lines. At that point the candidate was looking pretty bad, and told everyone thank you very much, that he had to get to some other appointments.

When my acquaintance came back to the studio, and it was an affiliate station, he got a call from New York, as the candidate's staff wanted to know who he was, why he was there, and where on earth he got his facts and figures, and if those facts and figures were correct. The New York newsroom told the staffer from the candidate's HQ that they knew of this reporter, he'd been in the industry a long time, and if he asked the question, then he had his facts to back them up, not to worry about it. The campaign staffer hung up the phone.

Apparently, the presidential campaign staffer wanted to get him fired for asking the questions and embarrassing the candidate on TV. Because the candidate had a huge budget for advertising they tried to pull their weight with the New York office. It didn't work. Thankfully, we still have freedom of speech and freedom of the press in this great country. But that just goes to show you some of the underhanded and disgusting things that happen behind the scenes.

He explained to me that although he would never agree to it, often reporters would agree to stick to a scripted number of questions, and not go off track as a condition for getting the interview. Not only that, they would give those scripted questions in advance to the candidate, so they could have their staff work on the perfect answer. As a radio listener, and a TV news junkie, I am completely concerned about these things, and ask; is the news even real anymore? Apparently it isn't, but there are some hard-core reporters still left the aren't so easily intimidated. Thankfully they still believe in freedom and liberty in this nation. Please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. http://www.worldthinktank.net/ - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow.

View the original article here